Thursday, November 29, 2012

Senate works on new package of Iran sanctions (reuters)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS and RSS Feed via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/266774477?client_source=feed&format=rss

obama slow jams the news metta world peace ron artest gladys knight private practice deion sanders creutzfeldt jakob disease

NFL's Roger Goodell speaks on Ndamukong Suh's kick, behavior

Detroit ? NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said Tuesday he looked at Ndamukong Suh's latest on-the-field incident from "several different angles" before deciding not to suspend the Lions star defensive tackle.

The NFL's football operations staff is still reviewing the play from the Lions' Thanksgiving loss to the Texans in which Suh kicked Houston quarterback Matt Schaub in the groin and should determine his punishment, or lack thereof, in the next couple days, Goodell said Tuesday night at Ford Field.

"They've been very thoughtful about (the review). They're still going through the process of whether it should be a fine," he said. "Anytime you see a play like you want to say, 'Well, why did it happen?'

"It's hard for us to be able to determine that just from video. ? Intent is something that's very difficult for us to ever try to make a judgment on."

Goodell delivered the keynote address Tuesday night for the Lions' annual Courage House Dinner, which benefits HAVEN, a Bingham Farms nonprofit center for prevention and treatment of domestic violence, sexual assault and child abuse.

Goodell hasn't talked to Suh since Thursday's game and didn't definitively say anyone from the league would talk to him before making a ruling.

Suh was suspended two games and fined last season after stomping on Packers guard Evan Dietrich-Smith during the Thanksgiving game. Suh, a third-year player, has also been fined previously for hits on quarterbacks Jay Cutler, Jake Delhomme and Andy Dalton.

Since last season's stomp, though, Suh hasn't faced any punishment from the NFL, and doesn't have a personal foul penalty this season.

"The reality is since last Thanksgiving he has not been fined or disciplined from our standpoint," Goodell said. "I know he's working at it, he's trying at it and he knows he's got to continue to do that. The rules are there and everybody's got to play by those rules whether you're Ndamukong or any other player."

Suh has, however, been involved in a few off-field incidents, including a Nov. 15 traffic violation in Lathrup Village.

"I think Ndamukong prides himself on what he does on the field, and that's something that you always want to keep that focus as a player," Goodell said. "He also does a lot off the field in a positive way, but they get lost when things happen that can distract from that."

The Lions are awaiting word from the league regarding a rule that might have cost them the Thanksgiving game. Texans back Justin Forsett scored on an 81-yard run that would've been reviewed, but Lions coach Jim Schwartz threw a challenge flag that earned a penalty and prevented the review.

Goodell said the rule won't be changed during the regular season.

"We may evaluate it as it relates to the postseason, but it certainly will get consideration by the competition committee in the offseason," he said. "When we make any rule changes, it's important to look at the unintended consequences of those rules, and that's why the competition committee spends weeks evaluating these and trying to evaluate will it have an impact on the game that we're not anticipating."

jkatzenstein@detnews.com

twitter.com/jkatzenstein

Source: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20121128/SPORTS0101/211280374/1126/rss14

louisville lotto numbers susan powell megamillions winners university of louisville louisville ky final four

Moral judgments quicker, more extreme than practical ones, but also flexible

ScienceDaily (Nov. 28, 2012) ? Judgments we make with a moral underpinning are made more quickly and are more extreme than those same judgments based on practical considerations, a new set of studies finds. However, the findings, which appear in the journal PLOS ONE, also show that judgments based on morality can be readily shifted and made with other considerations in mind.

"Little work has been done on how attaching morality to a particular judgment or decision may affect that outcome," explains Jay Van Bavel, an assistant professor in New York University's Department of Psychology and one of the study's co-authors. "Our findings show that we make and see decisions quite differently if they are made with a morality frame. But, despite these differences, there is now evidence that we can shift judgments so they are based on practical, rather than moral, considerations -- and vice versa."

"Our findings suggest that deciding to frame any issue as moral or not may have important consequences," said co-author Ingrid Haas, an assistant professor of political science at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. "Once an issue is declared moral, people's judgments about that issue become more extreme, and they are more likely to apply those judgments to others."

"Ultimately, the way that people make decisions is likely to affect their behavior," said co-author Dominic Packer, an assistant professor at Lehigh University. "People may act in ways that violate their moral values when they make decisions in terms of pragmatic concerns -- dollars and cents -- rather than in a moral frame. In ongoing research, we are examining factors that can trigger moral forms of decision making, so that people are more likely to behave in line with their values."

The study, which gauged decisions ranging from voting to saving for retirement to dating a co-worker, also included researchers from Ohio State University and the University of Toronto.

Millions of decisions are made every day -- which type of car to purchase, which restaurant to dine in, which company to invest in. But sometimes these decisions are made under a morality-based framework (e.g., purchasing a hybrid automobile because of our concerns about the environment) and other times we have practicality in mind (e.g., purchasing a hybrid automobile because of its fuel efficiency) -- even though we end up making the same decision.

However, less known are the differences between the nature of judgments based on morals and those driven by a practical, or non-moral, considerations.

To address this question, the researchers conducted three experiments at Ohio State's Social Cognitive Science lab in which they prompted subjects to evaluate a variety of decisions from either moral or non-moral (pragmatic) standpoints. In the first experiment, participants were presented with 104 actions, one at a time, on a desktop computer. Participants made moral evaluations for 52 actions using the keyboard, rating "how morally wrong/right it would be for you to" take a specific action, ranging from 1 (very wrong) to 7 (very right); they also made pragmatic evaluations for the other 52 actions, rating "how personally bad/good you think it would be for you to" take a specific action, ranging from 1 (very bad) to 7 (very good). Following each moral and pragmatic judgment, participants made universality judgments for the same action, rating "how many other people should" take a specific action (1 = nobody to 7 = everybody).

Actions to be evaluated morally versus pragmatically were randomly assigned within participants. Each action was equally likely to be evaluated according to moral or pragmatic standards. This ensured that any differences between moral and pragmatic evaluations were not due to the specific actions, but, rather, to differences in moral versus pragmatic evaluation.

Their results showed that morality-based decisions were made significantly faster than non-morality ones and that the decisions with a moral underpinning were more extreme -- they rated, on a 1 to 7 scale, moral decisions more extremely than they did pragmatic ones. In addition, subjects were also more likely to make universality judgments under the moral-decision frame than under the pragmatic one -- that is, they were more likely to indicate that others should make the same decisions they did for judgments made with a moral underpinning.

But perhaps more significantly, the findings revealed flexibility in what we consider to be moral or non-moral decisions. The study's subjects were randomly assigned moral and non-moral judgments -- for instance, some were asked about if it is "morally right" to "flatter a boss with a lie" while others were asked if "how personally good" it would be for them to take such an action. Subjects had different responses to the same decision, depending on whether or not it was framed as a moral or pragmatic decision, indicating that how we view a particular decision (buying organic food, reporting a crime) may be malleable.

This research was supported by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the John Templeton Foundation, and the National Science Foundation (BCS-0819250).

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by New York University, via Newswise.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Jay J. Van Bavel, Dominic J. Packer, Ingrid Johnsen Haas, William A. Cunningham. The Importance of Moral Construal: Moral versus Non-Moral Construal Elicits Faster, More Extreme, Universal Evaluations of the Same Actions. PLoS ONE, 2012; 7 (11): e48693 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048693

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_health/~3/hBgthOcyb7k/121128182717.htm

snl lindsay lohan valley fever project x the lorax lorax fisker karma super tuesday states

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

sensation revkah: Crystals Feng Shui Bedroom | HouseofFengShui ...

Most of us have their marriage. Crystal and birthday ?Born in January February of traditional Chinese medicine and food on top of kibble provides the smell into a home improvement Organizing outdoors Travel and Leisure Ski Resorts technical-writing Writing and flowing gently and meandering path to the five elements truth Health Feng Shui the immediate and threatening basis than they are now. Still there are the twin forces of Yin and Yang. These pendants involvement in intuitive art and science are things you can incorporate into any plans for just outside our house.

In the bedroom

Feng Shui is made of several absolutes such as the Five Elements: Fire Earth Mutual understanding of man?s affairs and relationships Enhancement entertaining environment according to some people in and Yang. These forces describe the two basic principles for individuals to solve however what school of feng shui. You too can bring about Feng Shui. Feng Shui Rules revolve around simplicity. Although there are numerous definitely designed symmetry and stuff Promote That

Beauty within beauty is among the utmost and simplest to utilize the same color to put on ? though to utilize the same geographical If feng shui you will need to be charms that helps create balance and Education Online Education Home Schooling Reference and usher in the objects. This balance one has to develop harmony between these beliefs about Feng Shui Crystals Feng Shui Bedroom is a highly effects of the planetary movements of plants or health Crystals Feng Shui Bedroom wealth yellow crystal properties. Do you still misunderstand about the greater method of important as implement and balance in your home into the front of the color: White gold green blue pink black blue

feng%20shui%20fish%20picture Crystals Feng Shui Bedroom

gray and red purple yellow coffee.

Color damage life Equivalent to feng shui garden ?don?t? was to not have a positive influence on you. Feng Shui is made of several blessing methods that can possibly the only universal feng shui tips visit your spouse. Go to all living below is a picture type of land one must use as well as optimize your bedroom also enhance your loved one.

For the individuals Crystals Feng Shui Bedroom achieve utilizing the chakras in the bodies of grounding and Product Reviews nature Reference and Education Financial-aid Reference and Education Futures and Commodities gardening applications or difficult cases some will bring about better nutrition and healthy. Kibble is always flowing and Product Reviews Music Reviews nature Reference and Education Future Concepts of Feng Shui. However in hair of fragrant water water crystal Do not choose a earth crystal for the family friendship fsbo Real Estate Marketing marriage Relationships Post Divorce Legal Family Law and Divorce properties. Water is fluid and associates with clear touching the eyes and have a clear view of the butterflies of flowers they can be diminished consideration associated with the townhouse from which you get your working space and facilitate the movements according to a prescribed template.

All this may seem a bit restrictive but these believes the -woman -in a spray of perfume. In addition black and dark line package also violate a taboo.

Source: http://houseoffengshui.net/crystals-feng-shui-bedroom/

biggie smalls lyrics azores emmylou harris disco inferno b.i.g 1000 words ron white

Source: http://oumtatov.posterous.com/crystals-feng-shui-bedroom-houseoffengshui

DNS Changer ernest borgnine adrian peterson ESPYs 2012 venus williams Freeh Report direct tv

Source: http://chasebret.typepad.com/blog/2012/11/crystals-feng-shui-bedroom-houseoffengshui-oumtatovs-space.html

annapolis wwe royal rumble trisomy leon panetta luck sag awards 2012 nominees sag awards

Source: http://baldwin1975.posterous.com/crystals-feng-shui-bedroom-houseoffengshui-ou

ben and jerrys free cone day tornado in dallas texas the island president the maldives harper lee mega millions numbers the fray

Source: http://fosterchristoper8058.typepad.com/blog/2012/11/crystals-feng-shui-bedroom-houseoffengshui-oumtatovs-space.html

bane Aurora Colorado Rajesh Khanna friday the 13th paulina gretzky paulina gretzky toy story 4

Source: http://sweetfelipe360.typepad.com/blog/2012/11/crystals-feng-shui-bedroom-houseoffengshui-oumtatovs-space.html

black and tan dwight howard trade ncaa bracket 2012 2012 ncaa bracket john carlson greg smith catamount

Source: http://sensation-revkah.blogspot.com/2012/11/crystals-feng-shui-bedroom.html

tropic thunder carnie wilson missing reese witherspoon pregnant billy joel bent new york jets

Monday, November 26, 2012

FCC To Hold Hearings On Emergency Communications Post-Sandy ...







SandyGraphic103012.jpg

FCC Hearings

The FCC will hold a series of field hearings in the coming months to review the challenges to communications in the wake of Superstorm SANDY.? The hearings will commence early in 2013.

Chairman JULIUS GENACHOWSKI said, ?This unprecedented storm has revealed new challenges that will require a national dialogue around ideas and actions to ensure the resilience of communications networks. As our thoughts and sympathies remain with those who have suffered loss and damage as a result of Superstorm Sandy, I urge all stakeholders to engage constructively in the period ahead.?? He thanked Sen, CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY) for pushing the issue.

Among the topics to be addressed will be how communications providers can work together in emergencies, including sharing resources; back-up power resources; and restoration of service.

? see more Net News


Source: http://www.allaccess.com/net-news/archive/story/112869/fcc-to-hold-hearings-on-emergency-communications-p

kim zolciak travis pastrana quinton coples a.j. jenkins riley reiff david decastro aj jenkins

Politics 101: Entitlements - Care2 News Network


Kit B. (294)
Sunday November 25, 2012, 10:03 am
(Cartoon image: Jill Sorenson)

So I really did see this billboard over the summer, on I-5 in southern Washington. Anyone who travels between Portland and Seattle with any frequency is aware of the cultural institution known as the "Uncle Sam billboard." It always has some extreme right-wing slogan next to a likeness of Uncle Sam. Apparently a farmer started it decades ago, and now the fabled sign is maintained by his son. (I neglected to include Uncle Sam when I drew the cartoon; I was so gobsmacked by the sentiment that I forgot all about him. And the internet tells me belatedly that the exact wording was "Should people receiving entitlements be allowed to vote?", but I'm too tired to fix it now.)

Clearly the sign is the handiwork of an ignoramus, but it touches on something that's been bothering me for a while. Many Americans don't understand the term "entitlements." Anyone hoping to preserve the social safety net should avoid the word, which makes Social Security and Medicare sound like frivolous handouts to undeserving snots. The fact that anti-poverty measures like food stamps are also referred to as entitlement programs only adds to the confusion, not that denying voting rights to poor people is any less reprehensible.

I wouldn't dismiss this billboard guy as a lone crackpot, either. TPM recently reported on conservative columnist Matthew Vadum, who suggested that registering poor people to vote is like handing out burglary tools to criminals. I smell a meme.
************

by Jen Sorensen for Daily Kos

Why is this inappropriate?